
Image by JJonahJackalope under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
By William Roberds, a research economist and senior adviser with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
Recently, there has been much discussion as to whether central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) should be introduced, and if so, how they should be designed. This article offers a historical perspective on this discussion, with a survey of early public bank (proto-central bank) “analog currencies” — circulating banknotes. Public banknotes were an experimental product when they were first issued in 16th-century Naples, but by the late 19th century, such notes could be found in most European countries. In between came all sorts of implementation difficulties: Egregious insider fraud, a real estate finance bubble, hyperinflation, rampant counterfeiting, and complete institutional collapse. Despite these many misfires, central bank-issued notes eventually became the default form of payment in virtually every country worldwide.
Key finding:
- Introduction of a new public payments instrument can entail serious operational and reputational challenges.
- Promoting the use of publicly issued instruments through exclusive privileges may simply motivate the private sector to innovate around these privileges.
- A successful public payments instrument will have monetary policy ramifications.
- Implementation difficulties notwithstanding, a lower-cost method of transacting can be very valuable to society, as was evidenced by the (eventual) widespread adoption of central banks’ notes.
The full text is available here.
❑
Leave a Reply