
(Coin photos courtesy of the Royal Mint. Background photo of the Round Tower of Windsor Castle by David Iliff. License: CC-BY-SA 3.0.)
On January 1, the Royal Mint unveiled a new Crown coin that marks the centennial anniversary of the introduction of the British Royal family’s dynastic name—that of Windsor, which was introduced in 1917. The circumstances of why the British Royal family changed its dynastic name were wholly due at the time to the consequences of what was referred to as the Great War, which began in 1914 (see below). The name of Windsor continues today, and it has been decreed by royal ascent by the current British head of State, HM Queen Elizabeth II, that the name of the dynasty should survive into the next succeeding generations and heirs to the British throne.
The coin is designed by Timothy Noad and includes a fitting representation of the dynasty’s name: a depiction of Windsor Castle’s Round Tower flying the royal standard, surrounded by a wreath of acorn and leaf clusters, symbolizing English oak trees. St. Edward’s crown is placed just above the royal standard. CENTENARY OF THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR surrounds the primary design, and the coin’s year of issue, 2017, is placed below.
The obverse includes the fifth effigy of HM Queen Elizabeth II, designed by Jody Clark and in use since 2015, along with the denomination, 5 POUNDS.
Denom. | Metal | Weight | Diameter | Quality | Mintage Limit |
£5 | Cupro-nickel | 28 g | 38.6 mm | BU | Unlimited |
£5 | .925 silver | 28 g | 38.6 mm | Proof | 13,000 |
£5 | .925 silver | 56 g | 38.6 mm | proof | 5,500 |
£5 | .9167 gold | 39.94 g | 38.6 mm | Proof | 884 |
The precious-metal versions include the edge lettering THE CHRISTENING OF A DYNASTY. The Brilliant Uncirculated coin is encased in a colorful presentation blister-pack folder. The silver Proof editions, issued in both traditional crown and piedfort strikes, are each housed in a custom presentation case with certificate of authenticity. The gold piece is housed in a custom-crafted wood case with certificate of authenticity. For more information on these and other coins offered by the Royal Mint, please visit their website.
The Creation of a Truly British Royal Dynasty
The creation of the royal family’s dynasty 100 years ago is unusual in the sense that it was done as a measure to show the people of Great Britain that their royal family was truly British in every way, with the exception of their roots and dynastic heritage. Although the history of the royal family teaches us that their claim to the English (later the British) throne spans back a millennium, technically speaking, the current royal family observed their dynastic tercentenary in 2014 with the anniversary of the arrival of the Elector and Prince George of Hanover to the United Kingdom. The German prince was recognized as the new king of Great Britain after the death of the country’s last Stuart monarch, Queen Anne, in 1714. The Hanover dynasty reigned in the United Kingdom until the death of Queen Victoria in 1901, as she was the last Hanoverian born in the male line to succeed to the British throne. It had been understood that a new dynasty would eventually be introduced onto the British throne as a consequence of the 1840 marriage of Queen Victoria to Prince Albert of Saxe Coburg and Gotha. Upon the accession of their son, King Edward VII, Hanoverian rule ended, and the new dynasty, that of Saxe Coburg and Gotha, was recognized.
As a result of the United Kingdom’s declaration of war on the German Empire in 1914, a wave of anti-German sentiment swept through the British Isles. At the height of the war, it came to the attention of King George V that a newspaper had described him as “uninspiring and alien,” to which he reportedly replied, “I may be uninspiring—but I’ll be damned if I’m an alien!”
There arose the question of what name should be adopted by the royal family. There was no English version of their dynastic name, and the actual surname of Saxe Coburg and Gotha was disputed as being either “Wettin” or “Guelph” (both very Germanic in their origins). It was suggested by the government that they adopt the name of the seat and traditional place of residence of the royal family: Windsor. The change was seen as perfect. The name’s association with the thousand-year-old castle and its place in British history would reflect both the tradition of the monarchy as an institution and the continuity necessary to assert the right of the current royal family to claim the British crown.
On July 17, 1917, King George V issued a royal decree:
Now, therefore, We, out of Our Royal Will and Authority, do hereby declare and announce that as from the date of this Our Royal Proclamation Our House and Family shall be styled and known as the House and Family of Windsor, and that all the descendants in the male line of Our said Grandmother Queen Victoria who are subjects of these Realms, other than female descendants who may marry or may have married, shall bear the said Name of Windsor…
With the name change, the king also renounced all of his German titles and honors and deprived his royal German relatives of their British titles and honors. Along with the Saxe Coburg and Gotha family, the families of the Battenburgs and Tecks—both related to the British royal family by marriage—would also undergo name changes. The Battenburgs adopted the name Mountbatten, a more English version of their ancestral family name, and the Tecks became the House of Cambridge. Queen Mary, wife of King George V, was a member of the Teck (now Cambridge) family. The current consort of Queen Elizabeth II, the Duke of Edinburgh, is a member of the Mountbatten family. Just before his marriage to the then-Princess in 1947, he adopted the surname of his mother’s family, and renounced his dynastic ties to the Greek and Danish royal families and name of Schleswig Holstein.
With the marriage of Princess Elizabeth to the newly recognized Lieutenant Philip Mountbatten (formerly HRH Prince Philip of Greece and Denmark), the question arose as to what name the royal family would take or be recognized with the accession of their son and heir, Prince Charles, born in 1948. In 1960, the Queen declared by royal assent that the descendants of Elizabeth II and Prince Philip who were not in direct line to the throne would bear the surname of “Mountbatten-Windsor,” and that the name of the reigning dynasty should continue to be “Windsor” until such time that another dynasty ascends the British throne by marriage or the family is exhausted of further eligible family members able to succeed. Currently, there are three heirs in direct succession who will carry the name of Windsor: HRH Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales; HRH Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge; and HRH Prince George of Cambridge. ❑
Share:
After watching all 10 episodes of the Netflix series, “The Crown,” my admiration for Queen Elizabeth is even higher than it used to be.
I’ll check that out — I almost forgot I have Netflix! Have you seen “The Queen,” with Helen Mirren and Michael Sheen? I came away from that with the same sense of admiration you mention.
Wish she was still our Queen.
Since 1952, it has admirably noticed in the UK and the English speaking world that the Queen has “never put a foot wrong” in the last sixty five years of her reign – constitutionally nor personally with the exception of the criticism of much of the Royal family after the death of Princess Diana.
I have often read that if the monarchy had been preserved in the US, the course of history would have certainly have taken a much different path – and that the notable presidents which the US has seen in the last 228 years since the inauguration of George Washington would have made exceptional Prime Ministers 🙂 but we’ll never know – at any rate, I do think many Americans do hold a special admiration for the Queen in particular which I think she’s aware of, I do think William will inherit this admiration as the son of Princess Diana who was incredibly popular in America.
The connection the the US and the Royal family is alive & well, long may it continue, it is truly a special relationship.