<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roosevelt Dime Attributions: NGC Full Torch &#8220;FT&#8221; vs. PCGS Full Bands &#8220;FB&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.coinupdate.com/roosevelt-dime-ngc-full-torch-ft-vs-pcgs-full-bands-fb-0236/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/roosevelt-dime-ngc-full-torch-ft-vs-pcgs-full-bands-fb-0236/</link>
	<description>Coin Collecting News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bugeja</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/roosevelt-dime-ngc-full-torch-ft-vs-pcgs-full-bands-fb-0236/comment-page-1/#comment-3752</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bugeja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=1674#comment-3752</guid>
		<description>Nice response, Darleen: And good information, too! Thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice response, Darleen: And good information, too! Thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darlene Pence</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/roosevelt-dime-ngc-full-torch-ft-vs-pcgs-full-bands-fb-0236/comment-page-1/#comment-3751</link>
		<dc:creator>Darlene Pence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=1674#comment-3751</guid>
		<description>I would choose No.2 only because I prefer NGC slabs. No.1 &amp; No.5 are good choices also as you can always send them to CAC yourself intead of paying the premium, unless your rich and foolish. The NGC star most likey is not an FT, but more than likey indicates eye appealing toning or prooflike characteristics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would choose No.2 only because I prefer NGC slabs. No.1 &amp; No.5 are good choices also as you can always send them to CAC yourself intead of paying the premium, unless your rich and foolish. The NGC star most likey is not an FT, but more than likey indicates eye appealing toning or prooflike characteristics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bugeja</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/roosevelt-dime-ngc-full-torch-ft-vs-pcgs-full-bands-fb-0236/comment-page-1/#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bugeja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=1674#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your contribution, Ken, and for reading the article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your contribution, Ken, and for reading the article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/roosevelt-dime-ngc-full-torch-ft-vs-pcgs-full-bands-fb-0236/comment-page-1/#comment-3026</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=1674#comment-3026</guid>
		<description>William,
I would choose the MS 67 FT, option 2, but you do bring up a great point.  
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William,<br />
I would choose the MS 67 FT, option 2, but you do bring up a great point.<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bugeja</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/roosevelt-dime-ngc-full-torch-ft-vs-pcgs-full-bands-fb-0236/comment-page-1/#comment-2128</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bugeja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=1674#comment-2128</guid>
		<description>William,

Good points. I would think a star (and possible now a plus!) would have to be FT.

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William,</p>
<p>Good points. I would think a star (and possible now a plus!) would have to be FT.</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Thorn</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/roosevelt-dime-ngc-full-torch-ft-vs-pcgs-full-bands-fb-0236/comment-page-1/#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>William Thorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=1674#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;d have to choose the MS67 NGC Star. Star status usually
applies to a coin with considerably higher quality and in return considerably higher value. I also think that a star graded coin would be FT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;d have to choose the MS67 NGC Star. Star status usually<br />
applies to a coin with considerably higher quality and in return considerably higher value. I also think that a star graded coin would be FT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Stinchcomb</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/roosevelt-dime-ngc-full-torch-ft-vs-pcgs-full-bands-fb-0236/comment-page-1/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stinchcomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 02:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=1674#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>I would choose the very first option.

1. 1946-S MS67 FB PCGS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would choose the very first option.</p>
<p>1. 1946-S MS67 FB PCGS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: news.coinupdate.com @ 2012-02-09 00:14:49 -->
