<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NGC &#8220;Plus&#8221; Earns a &#8220;Star&#8221; Over Insecure PCGS Plus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.coinupdate.com/ngc-plus-earns-a-star-over-insecure-pcgs-plus-0292/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/ngc-plus-earns-a-star-over-insecure-pcgs-plus-0292/</link>
	<description>Coin Collecting News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:49:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bugeja</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/ngc-plus-earns-a-star-over-insecure-pcgs-plus-0292/comment-page-1/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bugeja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=2852#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>I think NGC was very smart in how it aimed to serve its customers, Chris. Asking for input indicated to me that the company wanted to serve its clients in the best possible way. I say this as a long-time admirer and patron of PCGS. I do think PCGS has a lot to offer in consistent grading and customer service; NGC, of course, is world-class in those categories as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think NGC was very smart in how it aimed to serve its customers, Chris. Asking for input indicated to me that the company wanted to serve its clients in the best possible way. I say this as a long-time admirer and patron of PCGS. I do think PCGS has a lot to offer in consistent grading and customer service; NGC, of course, is world-class in those categories as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Machuga</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/ngc-plus-earns-a-star-over-insecure-pcgs-plus-0292/comment-page-1/#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Machuga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=2852#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always preferred dealing with NGC. To me, they are a people-oriented company. It means a lot when the president of NGC posts a thread on the Collectors Society forum asking for input from the members rather than saying &quot;This is how it&#039;s going to be!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always preferred dealing with NGC. To me, they are a people-oriented company. It means a lot when the president of NGC posts a thread on the Collectors Society forum asking for input from the members rather than saying &#8220;This is how it&#8217;s going to be!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bugeja</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/ngc-plus-earns-a-star-over-insecure-pcgs-plus-0292/comment-page-1/#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bugeja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=2852#comment-1379</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Richard. I look forward to your article. Drop off a comment on Coingrader Capsule when it comes out and let us know. Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Richard. I look forward to your article. Drop off a comment on Coingrader Capsule when it comes out and let us know. Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Stinchcomb</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/ngc-plus-earns-a-star-over-insecure-pcgs-plus-0292/comment-page-1/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stinchcomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 21:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=2852#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>Michael,

From what I can tell, neither one has the game right.  I have written an article that I am currently revising for a major coin publication that will deal with this topic of coin grading.  It may be a few months before it gets printed.

-Richard Stinchcomb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>From what I can tell, neither one has the game right.  I have written an article that I am currently revising for a major coin publication that will deal with this topic of coin grading.  It may be a few months before it gets printed.</p>
<p>-Richard Stinchcomb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bugeja</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/ngc-plus-earns-a-star-over-insecure-pcgs-plus-0292/comment-page-1/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bugeja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 18:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=2852#comment-1377</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John. Your comment means a lot to me. PCGS has to remember that customers, not its grading, elevated the status of the company. The hobbyist, and not the investor or dealer, defines the numismatic company. PCGS customer service still ranks high in my book; but that may change with the culture. Finally, keep in mind that I am criticizing the company that I am patronizing, so it still does cause me discomfort to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John. Your comment means a lot to me. PCGS has to remember that customers, not its grading, elevated the status of the company. The hobbyist, and not the investor or dealer, defines the numismatic company. PCGS customer service still ranks high in my book; but that may change with the culture. Finally, keep in mind that I am criticizing the company that I am patronizing, so it still does cause me discomfort to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C.</title>
		<link>http://news.coinupdate.com/ngc-plus-earns-a-star-over-insecure-pcgs-plus-0292/comment-page-1/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>John C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.coinupdate.com/?p=2852#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>Michael, 
I think you are to be commended for being a &quot;straight shooter&quot;. I too have been frustrated by PCGS and their snobbish attitude in much of their marketing and policy. Those of us who have to budget and save for our coin collections seem to be in the dust bin category at PCGS... so be it. &quot;Let them eat cake&quot; comes to mind. Thanks again from the cheapseats... the vast majority of everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
I think you are to be commended for being a &#8220;straight shooter&#8221;. I too have been frustrated by PCGS and their snobbish attitude in much of their marketing and policy. Those of us who have to budget and save for our coin collections seem to be in the dust bin category at PCGS&#8230; so be it. &#8220;Let them eat cake&#8221; comes to mind. Thanks again from the cheapseats&#8230; the vast majority of everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: news.coinupdate.com @ 2012-02-08 23:11:33 -->
